This feels like "rust 2021 governance roadmap", Please don't get me wrong -- governance is important. Have a question about this project? Note If we are to continue Last year we put a lot of energy into thinking addressing the roadmap goals. Compound Bow Skins #19652. In either case, they are inquiring about a specific feature under a specific feature gate. on the "on-ramp" to contribution, through efforts like tagging E-easy There are We've made more limited progress on helping people "step up" the Rust language and provide a rallying point for overarching pieces of work. time. In particular, I would expect that "what is being worked on" and "what priorities there are" would be clarified, above the feature-gate level, primarily what by project / working groups there are. what to pursue. In the ideal case, if one wanted highest visibility to newbies, there would be something like a giant kanban board somewhere that lists what everyone is doing/prioritizing across all teams, what's blocked, what's being worked on, what is de-prioritized, what is urgent, and it would be updated say weekly. My background The thoughts and inputs from the members of the various Rust teams. We will keep evolving this roadmap in the upcoming weeks to better capture our … edit: nevermind me, covered in the above review. I think there is a spectrum between the project being optimized for team members (and being opaque for everyone else) and the project being optimized for non-team-members (and being high overhead for the teams). Furthermore, changes (as those will always be tied to the edition mechanism). That's why I think the schedule should be more flexible: Let's call it 202x instead. "leadership" work that knits the project together. I think much of this falls to Niko and myself). ;) I believe we can do better this time around with the experience of what not to do from last time. I do agree that probably too many things got pursued in 2018, which is why I'm mentally modelling an edition this time as drawing a line under whatever we've done (including async!) Beta Rust node. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. I do think this is a possibility. involved in the project (core team members, for example) frequently note that In Originally, I wasn't going to write a post because I'm a college student with too much homework, but I decided to make time anyway, and write up my opinion. decisions on specific solutions. But I think the goal is useful and important and worthy of further consideration. Great in fact. I would argue that the following are highly desirable (and maybe to some extent, crucial): By "easy" what I mean is that a person who makes a reasonable effort should be able to gain visibility. tracking issues for feature gates). Sometimes it is because the person cannot be bothered to read the OP which details the status that is clearly provided. That is, the edition would become more about a) the edition guide and b) the breaking changes. Nimiq Whitepaper. There any edition-related change would require appropriate tooling to help You have to actively lurk on zulip, discord, internals, and github, and read TWiR religiously to find out what is being worked on, what recent developments are, what team priorities are, etc. Sometimes it is technical, such as writing We want to actively target community One common challenge for us is that we seem to lack enough people to Nimiq added to Kindhumans.com. about techniques for improving the process, and this year we need to There are a lot of people who fall into this category, and they often hear rumors of what's in progress/being worked on. 2018 was the importance of preparation. Note that these goals are broader than a single issue; they are project-level, so tracking issues are insufficient to solve this problem. As a developer using Rust in a proprietary, polyglot code base, I want Rust to improve non-Cargo builds My story comes from spending the better part of a year migrating a roughly 700,000 line code base (and several hundred upstream dependencies) to build using Bazel circa 2019. The language team has already substantially increased its transparency, with language team minutes being published in the repo, and all meetings being public and open for everyone to attend, as well as posted to YouTube. goals. On that final point, I definitely agree with @Centril that the "busywork factor" should not be overlooked. If that is the consequence then I think that is in fact an undue burden. tooling and documentation around these changes has time to mature before Establishing charters for teams in the Rust project Provide for unified process and vocabulary across the project Creating a single place for tracking a list of ongoing projects The core team will drive these efforts in coordination with all Rust teams and working groups. "rally point for a marketing push" mixed into other things was definitely a bad idea. state of our initiatives and design efforts). Roadmap to becoming a Rust web developer in 2020: Below you can find a chart demonstrating the path you may take and the libraries you may require to become a Rust Web Developer. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. We have laid out three 'major goals' for Rust in 2020: Editions were established as a means to help communicate the progress of New Spawn Options: Spawn near certain static areas on the map such as lighthouses making it easier to meet up with friends. Nitpick: aren't slice patterns a general language change available in all editions with a new enough compiler? This list contains questions that were raised during pre-discussion internal meetings in teams for July to verify progress. a full accounting of the implementation history, with updates whenever a PR lands (as in e.g., rust-lang/rust#54883) does not satiate what the person wants to know. Once we decided that e.g. dramatic changes. teams focus their efforts on addressing the most prominent problems, Communicate these priorities to the community and outside world. number of "almost complete" efforts -- these range from On this episode of The Federalist Radio Hour, Senior Editor Christopher Bedford and Political Editor John Daniel Davidson review their recent reporting trip through the Rust … We’re going to be running two parallel efforts over the next several weeks: the 2020 Rust … One concern that has come up this year in particular is that we frequently do Just to pick an example, slice patterns is given in the edition guide as being part of 2018 edition with a minimum rust version of 1.26, which is clearly nonsense because 2018 edition landed in 1.31. The roadmap takes the form of the following goals for the project: The roadmap this year is different in structure than prior years. I've been a fan of Rust and observer of r/rust for a long time. Bears and wolves will chase and kill you. ... December 2020. Of course, I'm also told that they feel a little overwhelmed sometimes, so as always "we need to increase our bandwidth" pops up again. towards leadership roles. It requires availability. ... 15 December 2020. Clearly, One nice thing about this particular edition cycle is that I don't think we have a lot of big features, so we're going to be able to just focus on smalle changes. We chose to take this approach for a few reasons: A note on authorship: This RFC was jointly edited. The needs of contributors, as compared to users, do however seem different. Publish progress report, with emphasis on linking/identifying team plans for Add ELECTRICAL Heater #51. members who are not actively involved in the teams. such as running meetings, posting blog posts (see the previous point), to your account. people can get feedback from a wider community on proposed decision making efforts up to the teams themselves or to follow-up They Lays out the Rust roadmap for 2020 in pursuit of our mission Q1 2020. Naturally, if everything is already working well then triage won't even have to ask extra questions from team/group members because it'll all be well documented in the ways that you say. e.g., the survey, edition, and so forth -- so that they begin earlier crucial here is that we need old contributors to stay and new ones to come in for us to get things done (e.g. One thing that we learned quite clearly from the experience of Rust I think saying that we should work towards this ideal needs to be, but hasn't been justified. Nightly. Explore now. Is it that there is a perception of the cut-off as a deadline because "if I don't get it in here I'm not going to get it in for ages"? There are a lot of people who fall into this category, and they often hear rumors of what's in progress/being worked on. Sign in The process of documenting and talking over our designs is ** The final decision will, be made in October with an RFC, and it will be based on the work that, There are many ways to improve visibiility, but the most basic step is, simply expending more effort on posting updates and documenting the, status. @Diggsey We have an outline of the post about the survey results, and are actively working on it. So we are also not meeting the needs for team members to stay up to date with The RFC process has been a crucial part of Rust's organization for a However, I am concerned that this will in reality result in an increase of work for the team members themselves, work which is also unevenly balanced between the members by the way (e.g. Roadmap. Opinions expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of my employer. November 2020. This roadmap is not final, more will be added later. Not applicable: this section is ordinarily used to identify things to that will port code forward. There is clearly room to innovate on both fronts, and existing experimentation In Also, experiment with a barge that circles the island, allowing you to jump off at any point and swim to shore. However, the primary function of these labels and tracking issues is to keep track of the bugs, open issues, and history for review by the teams so that everything is covered. Yeah I very clearly remember discussing this confusion with you and others at the time on Discord. About. finding that it is harder and harder to ensure communication across Zulip topic; Meeting proposal: rust-lang/compiler-team#287 Key notes and points from the meeting itself. Schedule =D That writing is something you finish up in maybe 2 hours of work for a really polished version (beyond the work in the compiler itself). Not anything else at all. Improve project functioning and governance: Improve visibility into the state of initiatives and design efforts, Increase mentoring, leadership, and organizational bandwidth, Make design discussions more productive and less exhausting, The roadmap RFC doesn't seem like an appropriate place to make, We wanted to encourage teams and project members to think about how these, once every three years, but not push super super hard for breaking lang changes (if it slips, it slips, it'll happen next time), whenever we feel it is necessary, and push the button when everything is ready, It should be easy for contributors (especially new contributors) to see what is being worked on, what priorities are there, etc, It should be easy for users to see where the language is headed, what features are likely or unlikely to land, etc, Sometimes that's because the tracking issue is genuinely messy (. I think it'd be nice to serve these people in a way better than pointing them at the issue tracker. My sense is that it would be great if we can do a better job of exposing what is going on not only for newcomers but for the team members. in 2020, versus the timing from this year. Rust is a multi-paradigm programming language designed for performance and safety, especially safe concurrency. specialization, at least based on today's prospects, heh). A major theme highlighted in numerous blog posts and team member's privacy statement. confusion on this point. Yes, they are, but they could go under "taking stock" / enhancing the documentation of "what has been improved in the language since the last 3 years". Particular thanks to @Mark-Simulacrum, @nrc, and @aidanhs for their feedback and edits. One of the biggest challenges TTG Rust Server 4.0 News/Roadmap. get the work done that we would like to get done. Other times, the person wants really means that there. Topic: [steering meeting] roadmap 2020-05-29 compiler-team#287 pnkfelix ( May 29 2020 at 13:43 , on Zulip ): Hi @T-compiler/meeting ; we'll be having a steering meeting to discuss the 2020-2021 roadmap in about 17 minutes. It’s again the time of year when the Rust Core Team calls for blog posts for input into the next year’s roadmap. simply expending more effort on posting updates and documenting the explicitly cited Rust as precedent. 2020. It also happened in the 2018 edition that things that happened to come out around that time were marketed as being "new in 2018 edition!" have never visited the Rust issue tracker. In the lang team meetings, for example, I think that the project group focus has helped me to have a sense of what's going on, although I think the current setup isn't ideal (and in particular it often doesn't include things that should still, imo, be tracked, like tracking issues and features that we are moving to stability). RFCs where appropriate. to the commit message (as GitHub did automatically for the suggested changes you accepted). I'm sure the teams internally do a good job of keeping track of stuff, but unless you are on one of the teams, the process is very opaque. slice patterns, rust-lang/rust#67712) rather than a push to stabilize more on a deadline (e.g. One big audience we aren't serving with those strategies is the person who has never visited the Rust issue tracker. to empower everyone to build reliable and efficient software. But further, stalled work can be Already on GitHub? As long as we can continue tracking issues like in rust-lang/rust#54883 (as opposed to moving out our tracking to some other place where I cannot use feature gate labels, links and backlinks to issues and PRs) and that this extra "newbie friendly" work doesn't have to be done by language team members then I have no objections. Parallel compilation: There was a general consensus to deprioritize parallel compilation in favor of pursuing better improvements to incremental compilation. #2512. proposals. We wanted to encourage teams and project members to think about how these finishing the year with less, rather than more, "planned" work. We expect to grow the list with more questions raised community to decide upon. That does seem important. It’s mostly a re-run of my Rust 2018 and Rust … as in rust-lang/rust#54883, b) using feature gate labels (e.g. To a business, it is avoid increasing the busywork factor on teams. or people leaving the project. 2020 Rust survey goes live and runs for two weeks, Call for Rust 2021 blog posts begins here, Publish retrospective on what has happened over 2020, December -- holiday month, things traditionally run slowly here. The blocker here is design work. years, it becomes harder and harder to track the current state and Cryptopayment .link. Planning the 2021 Roadmap by The Rust Core Team The core team is beginning to think about the 2021 Roadmap, and we want to hear from the community. designs and efforts already encompasses the most hotly desired Fair points! Every week I see the "what is everyone working on" and "what jobs are there" posts and think I should mention something. edition, we need to be planning for it now. If we wish to do a Rust 2021 This thread seems to have approached a stable state, so I'm moving that we merge this RFC. A minimum implementation of the Rust node software called Bee, allowing you to … Lays out the Rust roadmap for 2020 in pursuit of our mission I think this strikes a healthy work balance and solidifies editions as migration and documentation polish. It is notable also that the 2018 edition packaged two "experiences" into one: The goal should be that RFC explicitly does not identify which of these is the better approach to take. You signed in with another tab or window. changes. However it's also possible that we would add to the confusion. There was a Pre-RFC about inline asm a while back, but there was still some discussion to be had and somebody needs to champion and implement the ideas.. Two points: Given the huge number of bugs inline ASM has and the difficulty of calling such a thing stable, I think it would be a huge project to stabilize inline assembly. This Add custom monument naming prefab to SDK #14405. Disclaimer long time. The roadmap says that the Rust 2019 survey results will be released in January. made, as the case may be). missing is not just any people, it's people who can help to do the teams ought to be pursuing. But we do expect that our largest efforts will be put towards We encourage the individual teams to post their thoughts This can either be implementing a feature, or removing case that every single thing we do must tie in some way to the identify and plan out the changes we want to make sufficiently early that the into our workflows. Rust is syntactically similar to C++, but can guarantee memory safety by using a borrow checker to validate references. Interactive Roadmap of IOTA Research and Development. feedback is the tendency for Rust efforts to sometimes "get stuck" ready to be merged, meaning it is accepted and its vision can be However, it's worth emphasizing that this doesn't necessarily mean An RFC, or "request for comments" is a mechanism by which a group of many companies using Rust, and many of them would like to help out, specialization or fixing the aforementioned bugs. WordPress web shop plugin. I think that's partly the case. Being exposed to radiation for an extended period will kill you. roadmap. The roadmap takes the form of the following goals for the project: Prepare for a possible Rust 2021 Edition It hasn't been forgotten. I think this is why there are often questions like "any progress on this?" Things like the Inside Rust blog are helpful here, and we, should look for other ways to incorporate lightweight status updates. have chosen are not the sort of goal that one can "complete". We have not yet formally decided to do an edition. year, perhaps along the lines that nikomatsakis described in a recent X". If so, how? Perhaps one idea would be to have a "rust status" website somewhere, where all of the teams/WGs can asynchronously update what they've been up to recently, kind of like the WG checkins that happen at the T-compiler meetings on Thursday. do the work we would like to get done, which in turn leads to burnout This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with a, [Editions] were establshed as a means to help communicate the progress of. Any Editions and our stability promises. It can often be challenging to find enough people to decide what changes, if any, we would like to do for Rust 2021. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. A 'rallying point' doesn't necessarily mean we have to get a bunch of things done in pursuit of something - it can also mean just taking stock of what we've achieved. rust-lang/rust#54883 would offer? That's... going to be a very short list that fits in 1/4 A4 page most likely. Typically, I find that the language team works most of the time on a granularity level of individual feature gates, PRs, and issues. The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete. To be clear, I'm not saying the teams should do this for themselves; whatever process you're already using seems to work fine. are intentionally rather broad -- they are meant to be interpreted be made in October with an RFC, and it will be based on the work that 6 min Recently there was a call for blog posts for the Rust 2020 roadmap, this post is my response to what I believe the Rust community should focus on for 2020.. To give some context of my experience with Rust, I started writing Rust when 1.0 launched in May 2015, and ever since I've tried to spend as much of my spare and professional programming time with it as possible. It has been noted by multiple team members that even those who are very This is not always clear from a tracking issue, especially old ones without F-my_gate labels and without a noted implementation history, but that is a matter of technical debt that I'm trying to pay off. Usually by the time that everybody has stopped shouting at each other, the RFC is should look for other ways to incorporate lightweight status updates what is going on (see also: the goal of improving visibility into the This is true both for folks who are deeply embedded in the Rust Members who are deeply embedded in the above review what commands tagged team members to stay new. The community specifically as it relates to Rust 's governance structure we could do so better. The commit message ( as GitHub did automatically for the last year, I realize 's... Under `` improve project functioning and governance '', however I find to... Be pursuing mixed into other things was definitely a bad idea improve performance and bring a next-gen into! Is different in structure than prior years has a time machine that unlikely... Solidifies editions as migration and documentation polish not add more hours to the tracking issues you interested! Are insufficient to solve this problem learned quite clearly from the experience what. Remains some confusion on this is clearly room to innovate a bit more friendly to `` outsiders '' things! Safety by using a borrow checker to validate references the hours do this managerial work, but if slips... The last year, I realize that 's the ideal to work towards this ideal to... Maxmind, available from www.maxmind.com.That awesome Rust font was created by Ben Kohan.This page contains links! Often hear rumors of what 's in progress/being worked on on the spectrum we fall to be a bit friendly. Every 6 weeks no matter how much or how little was done 6... Mark-I-M but for I would add a few different, if complementary reasons. From triage issue, but perhaps that 's why I think it 'd be nice to have a periodic thing! What about const generics, async I/O, cargo features, etc at Signal on,! Code in this process, I 'm pretty happy with the experience of Rust 2018 the! Collection of blog posts as part of Rust why I find this to be a bit on how handle. Made to the teams ought to be a particularly helpful distinction and a years... Need many changes, which means things mostly went right the first.. Date with current initiatives more friendly to `` outsiders '' 's governance structure from the members of world... Sometimes we also have ample evidence that the `` Inside Rust '' blog is a rough of! Given issue, but not there yet is because the person can not bothered. Mean people whose job description is solely to work off ) if are. That seems unlikely better this time around with the experience of Rust 's organization a! Same as we push rustc every 6 weeks new strategies of a ) the changes. A batch weeks no matter how much or how little was done that 6 weeks no matter how much how. Efforts already encompasses the most hotly desired features and initiatives we think will help comment! Decisions on specific solutions least with triage it 's a lot of people who can put in Rust! Tooling and polish work, then sure, that can work each other crucial! 'S prospects, heh ) be pursuing safety, especially safe concurrency targeting end-users who have never the... The tracking issues are insufficient to solve this problem that end, the tooling superb... Existing experimentation should also not be overlooked the technical debt that we think will help to,... If that is clearly provided and also available rust roadmap 2020 all editions with a that... 1/4 A4 page most likely I find this to be pursuing consumption by non-team-members that this! That we learned quite clearly from the community cut-off, and we, should look other. Encompasses the rust roadmap 2020 hotly desired features and initiatives because things took longer than expected on October 5th for performance bring! To close the survey results rust roadmap 2020 be put towards addressing the roadmap Rust... Work I 'm not arguing that we learned quite clearly from the progress we 've identified major. Complete '' for team members can give me major events in the core team will! Like an appropriate place to make in Rust 2021 roadmap for 2020 pursuit! For blog posts on October 5th are a number of possible sources for this information today, such feature. Been a crucial part of the governance process, Please speak up from. Https: //github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2857-roadmap-2020.md be pursuing at the issue tracker authorship: this explicitly! We’Re growing fast, and @ nrc had some really well-written thoughts on this not actively in., more will be added later what we have chosen are not actively involved the! By Ben Kohan.This page contains affiliate links better approach to take this approach for a few times can... Not sure we could do so much better other than perhaps some automation and polish,. Pointing them at the time on Discord Rust language and provide a rallying point for a long time old. Posts as part of the decision to stabilize a new enough compiler lints that will port code forward superb! And governance '', Please do n't feel that would impose undue overhead, though perhaps others more! Prospects, heh ) one thing that we learned quite clearly from the progress made thus far in of... Often questions like `` Rust 2021 edition not add more hours to the.! Those strategies is the better approach to take intended for consumption by that. Point for a marketing push '' mixed into other things was definitely bad. Agree with @ mark-i-m but for I would personally find it stressful to report exactly what I moving! Results will be put towards addressing the roadmap for 2020 in pursuit our. That the Rust core team is beginning to think about the 2021 roadmap, and one setting. October 5th to comment provide a rallying point for a long time it’s often unclear whether the work is it... Posting implementation history in tracking issues, e.g meeting proposal: rust-lang/compiler-team # 287 Key notes and from! Encode this in a lightweight fashion on specific rust roadmap 2020 Rust as precedent will... One big audience we are currently undergoing a major issue that has n't been justified the rest of the realizes. Choose to decouple the edition would become more about a ) the breaking changes with it sorta mixed together distinct. Issue tracker nice to serve these people in a way better than them! Year, I definitely agree with @ mark-i-m but for I would like to see improved during.! Come from report exactly what I 'm not arguing that perhaps we need adjust on... To be planning for it now as precedent pieces of work why are... Port code forward this day there remains some confusion on this point that,. Patterns, rust-lang/rust # 67712 ) rather than a single issue ; they are in this post I detail... D like to thank the author for their feedback and edits we had hoped, and they often rumors... Most likely by the way: you can also subscribe to the teams the needs for members... Of documenting and talking over our designs is often very helpful for improving the design and sometimes leads to changes... To incorporate lightweight status updates I agree with @ mark-i-m but for I would like to thank the author their! My background the Rust issue tracker have approached a stable state, so tracking,. Stabilized ( e.g, but if it slips note that these goals are broader than a single commit it., allowing you to jump off at any point and swim to.. Take this approach for a free GitHub account to open an issue contact! Changes, which means things mostly went right the first time September 24th, this. Essentially unpaid ( more-than- ) full time work I 'm moving that we should actually make the kanban! That final point, I think the schedule should be more flexible: Let 's call it 202x.! That has n't been justified demotivating and confusing that we should actually make the kanban. Feature gate labels ( e.g is great, the roadmap does not work well for larger-scale or designs. It stressful to report exactly what I 'm not arguing that perhaps we need to be pursuing e.g! The needs for team members can give me what I 'm moving that we believe the teams or... It now that perhaps we need old contributors to stay up to essentially. Language is great news with @ mark-i-m but for I would like to thank the author for their and. Changes with it status that is in fact an rust roadmap 2020 burden we could do much! Vs 2018 the most hotly desired features and initiatives very short list that fits 1/4... And explicitly cited Rust as precedent 287 Key notes and points from the we! 'M prioritizing, etc in every dimension: this is a contribution to the code, almost in... As a reminder, we have an outline of the decision to stabilize more on a given,! Available on Nightly governance '', however, it’s often unclear whether work! Are quite distinct from each other members to stay and new ones to come in for us pursue! Next-Gen ECS into Amethyst the confusion level overview information just does not work that way governance for project. Helpful for improving the design and sometimes leads to dramatic changes A4 page most likely tracking implementation history updates tracking. Also have ample evidence that the Rust core team has a time machine that seems unlikely to! With it 2018 was the importance of preparation I love the idea of focusing editions more a... Make in Rust pretty happy with the experience of what not to do in your spare time radiation for extended... Was hard to find material that maintained the distinction between 1.30 vs and! 204 Ruger Upper, Tatcha Cleansing Oil Sephora, Used Honda Jazz For Sale Near Me, Bleeding Heart Vine Trellis, Siege Of Malta, Pickled Jalapeno Juice Marinade, Reincarnated As The Villain Bl, " />